Continuing with their inconceivable “numismatic creations” Is that this “1791” Trade with the “dotted N” reverse! The picture isn’t great, nevertheless the dotted characteristic is simple sufficient.The photographs or other 3rd party content material in the next paragraphs are A part of the shorter short article's Resourceful Commons

The subsequent graphic was a response to my write-up in PCGS’ CU forum; The poster stated the graphic goes again to February 2023. It seems for being a similar (popular) reverse.Also, test tearing the bill in half; if it rips conveniently, then it’s most likely copyright. Some bills have watermarks or safety threads that glow below ultraviolet